Penggunaan Monitor Detak Jantung dalam Intensitas 500 Meter pada Atlet Canoeing Stkip Pasundan Cimahi
The use of Heart Rate monitor technology has developed rapidly in the world of sports. However, there are still few accomplished sports coaches who use it during their coaching, although it can help the trainer to know the progress of the athlete's movements. This research is a pilot study that aims to determine the motion intensity of canoeing athletes by using a Heart Rate monitor in the PE training process. A total of 24 canoeing athletes aged 15 years and above were involved in this study. The instruments used were Polar GPS (Heart Rate monitor) RC3 and Polar GPS RC3 to measure the pulse and distance of canoeing athletes during training. During the process of coaching the training canoeing athletes obtain an average pulse rate of 138.94 ± 5.48 bpm, with a maximum pulse rate of 191.75 ± 10.36 bpm. The total distance traveled by a canoeing athlete is 0.23 ± 0.10 km. Coaching training carried out on average is in the low to moderate and medium to high categories. The use of a Heart Rate monitor in the training process is strongly recommended to be able to measure the intensity of motion.
Aughey, Robert J. (2011). “Applications of MONITOR DETAK JANTUNG Technologies to Field Sports.” International journal of sports physiology and performance 6: 295–310.
Beenham, Mathew et al. (2017). “A Comparison of MONITOR DETAK JANTUNG Workload Demands in Match Play and Small-Sided Games by the Positional Role in Youth Soccer.” Journal of Human Kinetics 57(1): 129–37.
Castellano, Julen, and David Casamichana. (2010). “Heart Rate and Motion Analysis by MONITOR DETAK JANTUNG in Beach Soccer.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 9(1): 98–103.
Coutts, Aaron J., and Rob Duffield. (2010). “Validity and Reliability of MONITOR DETAK JANTUNG Devices for Measuring Movement Demands of Team Sports.” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 13(1): 133–35.
Dallaway, Neil. (2013). “Movement Profile Monitoring in Professional Football.”. University of Birmingham. M.Phil.
Duffield, Rob, Machar Reid, John Baker, and Wayne Spratford. (2010). “Accuracy and Reliability of Devices for Measurement of Movement Patterns in Confined Spaces for Court-Based Sports.” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 13(5): 523–25.
Fjørtoft, Ingunn, Bjørn Kristoffersen, and Jostein Sageie. 2009. “Landscape and Urban Planning Children in Schoolyards?: Tracking Movement Patterns and Physical Activity in Schoolyards Using Global Positioning System and Heart Rate Monitoring.” Landscape and Urban Planning 93: 210–17.
Iacobucci, Gareth. (2017). Monitor detak jantung Urged to Be Cautious When Assessing Patients Fitness for Endurance Sports. BMJ 357.
Li, Ryan T. et al. (2016). Wearable Performance Devices in Sports Medicine. Journal Sports Health 8(1): 74–78.
MacLeod, H., J. Morris, A. Nevill, and C. Sunderland. (2009). “The Validity of a Non- Differential Global Positioning System for Assessing Player Movement Patterns in Field Hockey.” Journal of Sports Sciences 27: 21–128.
Malik, Arief Abdul, Moch. Arif Romadlon, and Hilda Indriani. (2018). “The Comparison of Player Movement in Global Positioning System (MONITOR DETAK JANTUNG) Based Basketball Game.” In 2nd International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education, eds. Ade Gafar Abdullah, Asep Bayu Dani Nandiyanto, Dian Budiana, and Cep Ubad Abdullah. Badung: Science and Technology Publications, Lda, 537–40.
Petersen, Carl J., David B. Pyne, Marc R. Portus, and Brian T. Dawson. (2011). “Comparison of Player Movement Patterns between 1-Day and Test Cricket.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 25(5): 1368–73.
White, Andrew D, and Niall G. Macfarlane. (2015). “Analysis of International Competition and Training in Men’s Field Hockey by Global Positioning System and Inertial Sensor Technology.” Journal ofStrength and Conditioning Research 29(1): 137–43